862.225.1965
The defendant lacked standing to challenge the search and seizure of his abandoned suitcase –State v. Gartrell, ___ N.J. ___ (2023)
In State v. Gartrell, ___ N.J. ___ (2023) (slip op. at 2),[1] the New Jersey Supreme Court held that the […]
Court Cases
Double jeopardy did not bar the retrial of the defendant in this complex death by auto case — State v. Zadroga, 255 N.J. 114 (2023).
In State v. Zadroga, 255 N.J. 114, 119 (2023), in November 2017 the defendant Stephen Zadroga was driving 85 to
Eyewitness Identification Safeguards Apply to Pre-trial Procedures– State v. Washington ___ N.J. ___ (2024)
On January 8, 2024, the New Jersey Supreme Court in State v. Washington, ___ N.J. ___ (2024),[1] issued a significant new case
Double jeopardy did not bar the retrial of the defendant in this complex death by auto case — State v. Zadroga, 255 N.J. 114 (2023).
In State v. Zadroga, 255 N.J. 114, 119 (2023), in November 2017 the defendant Stephen Zadroga was driving 85 to
Investigating detective’s introduction to defendant at her hospital bedside following a car crash was not a custodial interrogation warranting Miranda warnings — State v. Tiwana ___ N.J. ___ (2023).
In the case of State v. Amandeep Tiwana, decided on November 20, 2023, the New Jersey Supreme Court reversed the
New Jersey Supreme Court Ruling on DRE Testimony in State v. Olenowski II: Key Takeaways
In State v. Olenowski (Olenowski II), ___ N.J. ___ (2023),[1] the New Jersey Supreme Court addressed the admissibility of Drug
Shaken Baby Syndrome expert testimony is not scientifically reliable– State v. Nieves, ___ N.J. Super ___ (App. Div. 2023)
In State v. Nieves, ___ N.J. Super ___ (App. Div. 2023) (slip op. at 4-5, 57),[1] the Appellate Division found
New Jersey’s gun-carry permit statute is constitutional under the Second Amendment–State v. Wade, ___ N.J. Super ___ (App. Div. 2023).
In State v. Wade, ___ N.J. Super ___ (App. Div. 2023) (slip op. at 2)[1], the Appellate Division held that
Implicit bias in policing establishes a prima facie case of racial discrimination. State v. Scott, 474 N.J. Super. 388 (App. Div. 2023).
In State v. Scott, 474 N.J. Super. 388, 400 (App. Div. 2023), a woman reported to the police that as
Wiretap Interception of Privileged Marital Communications between Codefendant Spouses was Unlawful–State v. Gargano, ___ N.J. Super ___ (App. Div. 2023).
During the investigation of an alleged drug distribution network, the State Police obtained wiretap orders pursuant to the New Jersey