New Jersey Supreme Court Decision – Megan’s Law Registration 

On July 1, 2024, the New Jersey Supreme Court decided In re Registrant J.A., 258 N.J. 22 (2024), which reversed the lower court’s decision and clarified the requirements for terminating Megan’s Law obligations for juvenile offenders. 

Facts and Procedural History of Megan’s Law Case 

J.A. was adjudicated delinquent in 1999 for aggravated sexual assault and endangering the welfare of a child when he was fifteen years old. Following these offenses, he was later adjudicated delinquent for receiving stolen property in 2000 and second-degree robbery in 2001. As a result of the robbery conviction, J.A. was sentenced to four years in a juvenile facility and was released in 2004. Since his release, J.A. has not committed any further offenses and has led a law-abiding life. 

Legal Issue Regarding Megan’s Law Termination 

J.A. subsequently applied to terminate his registration and community notification requirements imposed under Megan’s Law. N.J.S.A. 2C:7-2(f) provides that to be eligible for termination, an individual must have remained offense-free for 15 years following their conviction or release from a correctional facility, whichever is later. Additionally, the individual must demonstrate that they do not pose a threat to the safety of others. 

Trial Court’s Interpretation of Megan’s Law 

The trial court found that J.A. was not eligible for termination of his Megan’s Law obligations under N.J.S.A. 2C:7-2(f) because he had not remained offense-free for 15 years after committing the predicate sex offense in 1999. The trial court found that J.A. had satisfied the public safety prong—finding that he had been productive, law-abiding, and presented a very low risk of reoffending—but it felt constrained to deny the application based on case law. The Appellate Division affirmed.  

New Jersey Supreme Court’s Decision on Megan’s Law 

The New Jersey Supreme Court reversed the lower court’s decision. The Court held that under the plain language of the statute, because J.A. was adjudicated delinquent as a juvenile in the family court, and not convicted for the predicate 1999 sex offense, he was only required to satisfy the public safety prong of N.J.S.A. 2C:7-2(f) and not the offense-free prong. The Court relied on its recent decision in In re Registrant R.H., 258 N.J. 22 (2024), which clarified that Megan’s Law requirements differ depending on whether the individual was adjudicated delinquent (as a juvenile) or convicted (as an adult). Based on the trial court’s findings that J.A. does not pose a safety threat, the Supreme Court ruled that he was eligible for termination of his Megan’s Law obligations. 

Conclusion: Key Takeaways on Megan’s Law Requirements 

The New Jersey Supreme Court’s decision in In the Matter of Registrant J.A. highlights the importance of differentiating between juvenile adjudications and adult convictions in the context of Megan’s Law. Juvenile offenders who have demonstrated that they do not pose a threat to public safety may be eligible for relief from Megan’s Law obligations, even if they have committed other offenses after their initial adjudication. This case underscores the evolving interpretation of Megan’s Law and its application to juvenile offenders, emphasizing the role of public safety in the court’s decision-making process. 

Criminal law is complicated and constantly changing. If you are facing criminal charges, you should immediately contact our team of experienced former prosecutors to schedule a free case review with one of our expert criminal defense attorneys. A complete understanding of criminal law by your attorney is crucial to your defense. Your rights and freedoms are in jeopardy, and you owe it to yourself to act. We are available to provide immediate assistance and further counsel on your case at 862-315-7929. 

No aspect of this attorney advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey.