New Jersey Family Law Decision – Parental Rights and Child Protection

On May 29, 2024, the New Jersey Supreme Court decided New Jersey Division of Child Protection and Permanency v. J.C., a pivotal case in New Jersey family law. In this case the New Jersey Supreme considered whether a family court judge may dismiss an action for the care and supervision of children brought pursuant to N.J.S.A. 30:4C-12 (Title 30), but continue the restraints on a parent’s conduct.

Facts and Procedural History in New Jersey Family Law

The case centered on J.C. (referred to by the fictitious name “Jan”), a mother with a history of mental health issues, including bipolar disorder with psychotic features. The New Jersey Division of Child Protection and Permanency (the Division) became involved in July 2018 when Jan was involuntarily hospitalized. Following a series of incidents, including paranoid behavior, the Division filed a complaint under Title 30, seeking care and supervision of Jan’s two children. Initially, the Family Part Judge granted the Division care and supervision of the children. However, by 2021, Jan’s mental health had not significantly improved, she resisted taking her medication, and she was uncooperative with the Division. As a result, the Law Guardian requested the dismissal of the Title 30 action, and the Division asked the court to consider dismissing the case with restraints on Jan’s contact with her children.

Legal Issue of Restraints Under New Jersey Family Law

The central issue on appeal was whether the Family Part had the authority to impose ongoing restraints on Jan after dismissing the Title 30 action. The New Jersey Supreme Court ruled that the Family Part’s actions violated the statutory guidelines of New Jersey family law under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-12.

According to the statute, when a family court imposes restraints, the case must remain open to ensure continued judicial oversight, especially to safeguard the parent’s right to counsel.

The New Jersey Family Law Court’s Rationale

In its reasoning, the New Jersey Supreme Court emphasized that when a Title 30 case is dismissed, the parent is no longer entitled to appointed counsel. This denial of legal representation constitutes a violation of due process. The Court further noted that judicial review is necessary in these cases to ensure that continued restraints are in the best interests of the child. Without such oversight, the restraints on Jan’s contact with her children were deemed inappropriate under New Jersey family law.

Conclusion: Key Takeaways for New Jersey Family Law

The New Jersey Supreme Court’s ruling is significant for New Jersey family law. It reaffirms that family courts cannot dismiss a Title 30 action while maintaining restrictions on a parent’s conduct without judicial oversight. If restraints are necessary, the case must remain open to ensure the continued protection of both the parent’s due process rights and the child’s best interests. This decision serves as a crucial precedent in child protection cases, ensuring the balance between parental rights and child welfare is carefully maintained.

Criminal law is complicated and constantly changing. If you are facing criminal charges, you should immediately contact our team of experienced former prosecutors to schedule a free case review with one of our expert criminal defense attorneys. A complete understanding of criminal law by your attorney is crucial to your defense. Your rights and freedoms are in jeopardy, and you owe it to yourself to act. We are available to provide immediate assistance and further counsel on your case at 862-315-7929.

No aspect of this attorney advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey.